Example One: An Offer to Vaccinate

Let's say that you doctor has sent you a letter insisting that you bring in your child for vaccination, and it is worded in such a way as to seem like it is a mandatory duty to do so.   Rather than refuse, argue or protest, another way would be to agree to allow the vaccination on the condition that the doctor proves certain things first.

Such a conditional acceptance might look like this:

Notice of Conditional Acceptance

Dear Dr. Poisoner,

Thank you for insisting that my child receive the [Vaccine Name] vaccine, your concern for the welfare of my family is most touching.

I am happy for my child to receive this and any other such vaccine that you care to administer, on the condition that you provide the following:

1. At least, one double-blind, placebo controlled study that proves the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.
2. Scientific evidence on any study which confirms the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccines.
3. Scientific evidence which proves that any disease reduction at any point in history was directly attributable to vaccination of a population.
4. Scientific justification as to how injecting a human being with a confirmed neurotoxin is beneficial to human health and prevents disease.
5. Scientific justification on how bypassing the respiratory tract or mucous membrane is advantageous and how directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream enhances immune functioning and prevents further infections.
6. Scientific justification of how a vaccine would prevent viruses from mutating.
7. Scientific justification as to how a vaccination can target a virus in an infected individual who does not have the exact viral configuration or strain the vaccine was developed for.

And finally, since it is my understanding that vaccines actually place the recipient at a risk of developing a wide range of diseases and conditions, so you are also required to complete, sign and return the enclosed Liability Statement, in the presence of three witnesses.

Please respond with substance and with the requested proofs of claim within seven (7) days, failure to do so will be deemed to mean that no such proofs exist and it is your medical opinion that the proposed vaccination is not safe.

Yours Sincerely,

Using this approach, you are not actually refusing or opposing the doctor, quite the contrary, you are agreeing with him but only if he provides you with proof of his claims, which are impossible to provide, placing the burden of proof on the doctor.

There is nothing tricky about this, a doctor wanting to vaccinate a child should know for sure that what he is doing is safe and if he cannot then that should be a red flag for the doctor himself, should he be administering this vaccine if he has no evidence it is safe?

In this particular case, I would also firmly place the ball back in the doctor's court with a Liability Statement with which the doctor will explicitly accept liability for the possibly consequences of his actions, something that, from a moral standpoint, he should be doing anyway, but he will never sign this and accept liability for his actions.

Liability Statement

I, [Doctor's Name], as the physician administering the [Name of Vaccine] vaccine, have thoroughly examined the patient, [Patient Name] and have determined that the patient does not have any of the conditions listed below.

I therefore accept full responsibility and full commercial liability should the patient be subsequently diagnosed with any of the following conditions as a result of receiving this vaccine:

[The disease the vaccine was designed to inoculate against], allergic reactions, ADHD, autism, AIDS, cancer, pneumonia, encephalitis, meningitis, hepatitis, Epstein-Barr disease, encephalopathy, febrile convulsions, non-febrile convulsions, paralytic poliomyelitis and Guillain Barré syndrome.

Signed in the presence of three witnesses:

Dr. .........................................................           Signature ......................................................

Date ...............................................................

Witness..................................................           Signature ......................................................

Address ..................................................................................................................................

................................................................................................................................................

Witness..................................................           Signature ......................................................

Address ..................................................................................................................................

................................................................................................................................................

Witness..................................................           Signature ......................................................

Address ..................................................................................................................................

................................................................................................................................................

Send this and any relevant documents (such as the liability statement in this case), recorded delivery and staple the receipt to your copy of the documents.    As long as you have asked the right questions, your opponent will not be able to provide the requested proofs of their claims against you within the reasonable time period that you have allotted them, but as an honorable man/woman it's only fair to give them more time to respond.
So, after the time limit expires, follow up with a Notice of Default with Opportunity to Cure which explains the situation as well as your generous extention of time. (a PDF sample is available below)

Once this further period expires and your notice of default is dishonoured then you finish by sending a Notice of Default and of Estoppel by Acquiescence..   This notice summarises what has transpired so far and noted that their silence or inability to provide the requested proofs of their claims has resulted in a binding agreement that their claims are invalid and thus creates a condition of Estoppel, which means that once an agreement had been reached (even by tacit aquiescence) your opponent is prevented from making assertions that are contradictory to this established determination.
At this point, it is also useful to give notification of your fee schedule for, say, responding to communications regarding this matter, and that's it, in this case, the Doctor has nowhere to go, he cannot force the vaccine upon your child without taking liability for his actions, and even if he attempted to, you can take him to court regarding the breach of a legally binding agreement between you.

I've included an example of a Courtesy Letter that you may want to send, along with your invoice for the amount specified on your fee schedule, should the Doctor attempt to contact you further on this matter.

Example Two: Speeding Camera Tickets

You receive a Notice of Intended Prosecution, it looks pretty scary, and many would feel intimidated by it enough to just pay it and make the scary words on a piece of paper go away, however, this "Notice" is merely an offer. Why would they notify you that they intend to prosecute you? If they have evidence that you have committed a crime, wouldn't they just prosecute you?    Of course they would, they are making you an offer for you to confess to a statutory violation and pay a fine.

Once again, the way to deal with this situation honorably, is to conditionally accept this offer upon proof of the claims presented.

Notice of Discharge of Notice of Intended Prosecution and Request for Clarification

Dear Mr. RevenueCollectorPig,

I write with reference to your Notice of Intended Prosecution dated 1st January 2019.

I must admit that I do not understand the alleged offence and I am requesting clarification of a few points.

I note that you are contemplating proceedings against the driver of a motor vehicle identified as a Rolls Royce Silver Ghost.   While, I do own a private automobile which fits that description, it is not a motor vehicle as defined in section 185(c) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 as "a mechanically propelled vehicle intended or adapted for use on roads" since the use of the indefinite article "a" at the beginning of the sentence means that it is not necessarily a vehicle, in the same way that an apple might be defined as "a round, red fruit", plums and cherries share the same attributes but they are not apples, nor are they different types of apple.
Furthermore, having consulted a number of legal dictionaries I find that the definition of a driver is one who is engaged in commerce on the road. For example Black's Law Dictionary defines a driver as: "One employed in conducting a coach, carriage, wagon, or other vehicle, with horse, mules, or other animals, or a bicycle, tricycle, or motor car, though not a street railroad car."
And since I have never, ever engaged in commerce upon the road it appears that I am not a driver and I have never engaged in the practice of driving.

1. Can a man or woman who is not driving a vehicle be charged with the alleged offence?

The alleged offence apparently took place at 16:56 on 25 December 2018 at UPPER THAMES STREET BY STEW LANE. It is quite possible that I was travelling in my private automobile at that time, and on that day but I am not familiar with UPPER THAMES STREET BY STEW LANE so can neither confirm nor deny my location. The enclosed photocopied pictures do bear a striking resemblance to my private automobile but I have not been presented with any material facts or evidence that it is the same.

2. Could you provide the sworn testimony of the complainant and witnesses who have firsthand knowledge of the matter?

As an honourable man I am distressed at the thought that I may have inadvertently caused harm or loss to someone and would naturally wish to make redress or compensate any loss. However, I have carefully studied the "photographic evidence" but yet it fails to display any evidence of injury, loss, damage to property or a breach of the peace.

3. Could you provide the name of the injured party and his or her sworn testimony detailing the nature of the tort?

Please provide satisfactory answers to these three questions with substance and accompanying documentation and proofs in Affidavit format sworn under oath or attestation, under penalty of perjury and upon your full commercial liability that the facts contained therein are true, correct, complete and not misleading.

If I do not receive such a response conforming to the above criteria within seven (7) days of the date of this letter, it will be deemed a tacit agreement by your acquiescence that no offence took place and that all parties to mean you and your principal or other parties abandon all demands upon me.

I must also decline your offer to complete the form on the reverse of the Notice of Intended Prosecution as I am not willing to provide consent or evidence for use in any subsequent prosecution of this alleged offence.   Also, since the paragraphs instructing me to complete the form both appear within boxes upon the face of the document then the 'Four Corners' rule applies and thus may be disregarded without dishonour.

Sincerely without malice, ill will, vexation or frivolity

Now there are a few concepts introduced in this notice that you may not be aware of, so let's dive in:

Driving is a commercial activity, if you are not employed to conduct business on the public roads, then you are a Traveller, not a Driver, and if you are not a Driver, then the rules, licences, taxes, fees and duties of a driver do not apply to you!
But if you confess or agree to being a driver then now thoses rules and regulation do apply to you.   However, if you don't play along and confess to being a driver, then the burden of proof is now on them to prove that you are engaged in the commercial activity or "Driving".

The notice probably also included a photocopy of a photograph of your car, but while it might appear that there is evidence against you, be aware that a photograph is NOT evidence.   The only admissible evidence would be a statement of a witness with first hand knowledge of the alleged offence, the photograph is merely an intimidation tool to illicit a confession from the unwary.
If a crime is alleged to have been committed, then there needs to be a complaining party and witnesses who have firsthand knowledge of the matter, but if it is a statutory violation then you need to see the lawful contract that where you agreed to abide by the statute.

There is also a little known rule, known as "The Four Corners Rule" which means that any text which is contained within a box on the document, then it is not considered as part of that document, and so can be ignored.   If you read a document, ommitting anything that appears within a box, then you may find that the document does not actually say what you think it says.

Along with the Notice of Discharge of Notice of Intended Prosecution and Request for Clarification, I have included a Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure that is sent once the expiry period specified in the Notice of Discharge has expired, and finally the Notice of Estoppel to be sent once both notices have been dishonoured.   I have also included the actual final response from City of London Police which essentially was a Technical climb down.

Example One: Automobile Notice

When travelling in your privately owned automobile, there seems to be no shortage of people offering you exciting opportunities to use their services, such as offers to pay for parking your automobile, offers to pay a fine for not paying, offers to have them tow away your automobile and many more.

But, just as they can offer their services to you, you are just as entitled to make them offers and counter offers.
Place the following notice (best printed out to A5 paper size) in a prominent position in the windscreen, so that it cannot be missed by a parking attendant placing a ticket, but not so that it obstructs you view of the road.

Notice

U.K. Common Law Jurisdiction

Any person/persons including but NOT limited to; Civil Enforcement Officers (CEOs), 'DVLA Officers and/or their 3rd party Agents', 'Police Community Support Officers' (PCSOs), 'Private Revenue Collection Officers' (PRCOs), 'Traffic Wardens' who film, photograph or attach anything to this private conveyance including but NOT limited to; 'Parking Notices/Notices' (PCNs) & Wheel Clamps for the purpose of generating revenue will thereby be entering into a contract with us therein agreeing to the terms & conditions of said contract including but NOT limited to; The Fee Schedule as detailed herein:

1. You agree to pay £250.00 (TWO HUNDRED & FIFTY POUNDS STERLING) for each notice that is attached / issued to this private conveyance*
2. You agree to pay £125.00 (ONE HUNDRED & TWENTY FIVE POUNDS STERLING) for each image/photograph that you take of this private conveyance*
3. If you clamp this private conveyance you thereby agree to pay £500.00 (FIVE HUNDRED POUNDS STERLING) per hour or portion thereof until the clamp is removed*
4. If you move, relocate or tow this private conveyance you thereby agree to pay £750.00 (SEVEN HUNDRED & FIFTY POUNDS STERLING) per hour or portion thereof until the private conveyance is returned to me, its lawful owner

*In addition to items 1,2,3 & 4, you are liable without limitation for any damage caused to this private conveyance. It is a punishable Common Law Crime to cause harm, injury or loss to another human and/or their property.

As soon as a revenue collection agent attempts to place a ticket on your automobile, place a wheel clamp or tow it away, then it can be assumed that they have read your prominently displayed notice and so have agreed to your terms and conditions, in many cases, this alone has been enough to deter traffic wardens and car park attendants from placing parking tickets, however, should one actually agree with your terms and conditions then send in your payment with a note saying something to the effect of:

"Your parking attendant was good enough to contract with me by placing a ticket on my privately owned automobile, and therefore agreed to my terms and conditions clearely displayed on the aforementioned automobile.  In this case the fee for someone attaching paperwork to my automobile is £250.00

I enclose your requested payment of £25.00, my invoice for £250.00 and a copy of the notice that is clearly displayed on my automobile.   By accepting and cashing this payment, it will be deemed that you have accepted my fees, which become payable immediately; Please pass my invoice to your finance department for processing"

So long as you make sure that your fees are substantially more than any car parking fees you may encounter, you are likely to find your payment returned to you.

Example Two: Removal of Implied Right of Access

When you open your door to a Police Officer, a Bailiff, a Debt Collections Officer or any corporate agent, you are implying that you are inviting them into your home, and one you have made this "invitation" then they have a right to take you up on your invitation, whether that was your intent or not, this is called the "Implied Right of Access" and it is used as a justification for most of the cases of forced entry... Just like Vampires, you have to invite them in.

Place the following Notice beside your front door in a prominent position (I had mine laminated) or better still place on or around the front garden gate if possible:

Notice of Removal of Implied Right of Access

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

You are advised to read the following notice thoroughly and carefully. It is a lawful notice. It informs you. It means what it says.

I hereby give notice that the implied right of access to the property known as [YOUR ADDRESS HERE] and surrounding areas, has been removed, along with all associated property including, but not limited to, any private conveyance in respect of the following:

1. ANY employee, principal, agent, third party, trustee, representative or any other person acting on behalf of or under the instruction of any CORPORATE BODY (i.e. Company) howsoever named and,
2. ANY POLICE OFFICER who is acting for the CORPORATE POLICE and NOT acting as a Constable for and on behalf of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and her people as expressed in the Oath of Office of all POLICE men and women, that is as Public Servants, upon your Oath of Office to serve "with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property"

Any and all access to the above mentioned properties shall be by strict invitation only and shall be subject to terms and conditions, available by written request.

Any permission that you believe you may have from me is hereby withdrawn. If you believe that you have power of attorney to act on my behalf you are hereby fired, and any consent that you believe you may have, tacit or otherwise, is hereby withdrawn. If you feel so inclined as to enforce statutes as a consequence of this matter I will report your conduct to ALL relevant bodies and will pursue Proof of Claim in affidavit form, under your full commercial liability and under the penalty of perjury.

You are deemed to have been served this notice with immediate effect.

This notice explicitly removes any assumptions or presumptions and so no right of access is given, implied or otherwise.   The words "An Englishman's house is his castle" is not merely some quaint anacronistic expression, but a legal maxim describing an ancient right, long forgotten in the face of the perceived and pretended authority of Police and corporations over a sleeping populace.

Affidavits

An affidavit, on the other hand, is a sworn statement of truth in writing, made under oath or on affirmation and is based on the maxim in law "An unrebutted Affidavit stands as truth in commerce, equity, admiralty..."

More coming soon!

The Bills of Exchange Act 1882 describes a Promissory Note as a specie of money considered to be the same thing as "cash", it also states that if a promissory note is tendered, and it is rejected then the debt no longer exists.

But if a promissory note is just an IOU, then wouldn't you have to pay upon it?   Well, yes you would, except that you can't, because there is nothing to pay with until the Bank of England make good on their promises to pay on their notes.

If you look at a ten pound note, you'll find written, the words "I PROMISE TO PAY THE BEARER ON DEMAND THE SUM OF £10" and the signature of a representative of the Bank of England.   Have you ever wondered 'Ten pounds of what exactly'? Because it's not gold or silver or a bushel of turnips.   There is no actual money!

The banknotes in your pocket are worthless pieces of paper bearing meaningless promises, and if you were to go to Threadneedle Street to redeem your £10 note, if they do not immediately call for security and throw you out of the building (which is what they invariably do) they will simply exchange it for two five pound notes, bearing the same empty promises.

Of course, promissory notes are not for use in this way for agreements between real people, but only when Government (or Corporations) create a public debt without providing the remedy with which to discharge it, and so expect you to work to earn worthless IOU to pay them, then you can create your own IOU's, promising that you will pay as soon as the Bank of England make good on their promises to pay.

How to make a Promissory Note

You can write a promissory note on a piece of toilet paper if you wish, as long as it says "I promise to pay the bearer...", displays the amount, the due date (or on demand) and a signature, it's a valid specie of money, however, I like to be a little fancy about it and get some good quality certificate paper with maybe a fancy border, so that, just like the banknotes, it gives the impression that it is valuable.   Below is an example of a promissory note for £500:

PROMISSORY NOTE

£500.00

I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of

FIVE HUNDRED GREAT BRITISH POUNDS

subsequent to the Bank of England having honoured their promise on their banknotes.

By: LORD COMMISSIONER OF HIS MAJESTY TREASURY UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF ACT OF PARLIAMENT lV AND V.GEO.V.ER.XlV TENDER IN TERM OF THE BILL OF EXCHANGE ACT 1882 c.61
(1882 CHAPTER 61 45(8)a and 46 Vict AND SETTLEMENT IN TERMS OF HIGH COURT RULE)

By: john-james: smith_________________________

Authorised Representative for JOHN JAMES SMITH

Acknowledgment

Affirmed and endorsed before me by John: Smith, known to me or proven to me to be the real man signing this promissory note, on the _______________ day of ______________, 20___.

Witness 1 ..................................

Address ....................................

..............................................

Witness 2 ..................................

Address ....................................

..............................................

Witness 3 ..................................

Address ....................................

..............................................

You will note that at the bottom, I depart from other promisorry note designs by including an affirmation section and space for three witnesses to sign, it is a good idea to have your promissory note notarised by a Notary Public but since it is increasingly difficult to find Notaries who are actually willing to do their jobs, having three witnesses attest that you signed it works just as well.

In addition to the note, I suggest including a cover note which explains the situation, supplying the relevant case law and rulings as well as providing the recipient with further instructions.

John: of the Smith family
c/o 100 Any Road,
ANYTOWN
Anyshire [AA1 1AA]
1^st January 2018

Dear Mr. Bastard,
Thank you for your Offer(s), Notice of fine and collection order, dated 30th December 2017, unfortunately, I found no cheque attached. Therefore, I am accepting the Offer(s) and returning it with a promissory note for the immediate discharge of this account.

For the avoidance of doubt, the Statutory definition of a Promissory Note, as stipulated in the Bills of Exchange Act 1882, is "Cash", this has been subsequently reinforced by a ruling by Lord Justice Denning who stated:

"We have repeatedly said in this court that a bill of exchange or a promissory note is to be treated as cash. It is to be honoured unless there is some good reason to the contrary"
(see per Lord Denning M.R. in Fielding & Platt Ltd v Selim Najjar [1969] 1 W.L.R. 357 at 361; [1969] 2 All E.R. 150 at 152, CA)

The JOHN SMITH and THIEVING CORPORATION are both operating in national bankruptcy, you are therefore directed to discharge this account immediately and make or cause to be made all necessary adjustments.

This serves Notice that this account is now: Discharged.

With respect to Lord Denning's 1969 ruling and the Bills of Exchange Act 1882 I now consider this matter closed.   I suggest that you pass this letter to your legal department to review the relevant acts and rulings.

Please forward an updated statement of my account showing the true balance.

Thanking you in advance.

Yours Sincerely,

It is almost certain that they will reject this offer to effect payment (and you can only ever "effect" payment because there is no money but promissory notes givng the effect of payment).
If they return the promissory note, then you can remind them of the clause in the Bills of Exchange Act 1882 which states that if payment is tendered, and it is refused, then the debt is cancelled, otherwise the thing to remember is that it is not what they say but its all about what they do.

They will normally send a reply saying how they do not accept your promssory note and that you still owe them the amount, however, what they haven't done is return your promissory note and if they keep it then they have accepted it, no ifs or buts, you have given them a payment that they can and will monetise.   So, it is no different from owing a friend £10, and you give him a Michael Jackson CD as payment and your friend keeps it, do you still owe him £10?

So, if the note is not returned then, no matter what they might say in their letter, the promissory note has been accepted and the 'debt' no longer exists because it's been paid in full. Now, the issue is no longer about whether you owe them anything, it shifts to them having to prove that your payment is not valid despite the case law and court ruling that says it is.

So this is where the chess game begins, your opponent will not return your promissory note because it is actually worth the value of the note and they can, and probably already have, monetised it, however, they will act as if they consider it worthless and have not accepted it, hoping that you are still programmed to believe it was really only a piece of paper and of little to no real value, and so will continue to bully you for payment.

You must remain confident that your signature on that document is valuable and let them know that you would be as pleased as punch to provide them with an alternate means of payment as soon as your property (which you know is valuable) is returned to you.

Remittances

More coming soon!

A bank loan might seem fairly easy to understand, you ask a bank, who has the money, for a loan, they give you a loan agreement to sign in order to agree to their terms and conditions, the bank moves money to your account and now you own them that money back with interest.

The problem is that it doesn't quite work like that... The so-called loan agreement, amongst everything else, bears the loan amount, a date and a statement where you promise to pay back the amount plus interest and when you sign it, you create a Promissory Note, a valid specie of money, often worth many times the original amount (the loan amount plus interest)... Yes, you create the money!

The bank doesn't move any gold, silver, coins or notes around but instead simply types the loan amount into an account in your name in the form of credit, not money.   You are now free to redeem this credit in the form of banknotes (this happens very rarely) or 'spend' it via electronic purchases that are authorised by the bank, or electonically transfer the figures from one account to another.

Can you see what is happening here? The bank never actually gave you anything, but electronic credits that are sent back and forth between banks within their system. The real money is the 'loan agreement', which is not only the contract between yourself and the bank, but also the only evidence of the loan.   However, what the bank chooses to do, with this important security document, is to sell it!

And now comes the trick, a month later a statement arrives showing that your account was debited by the loan amount and the amount that you now own back, however, the statement is missing a very important item, that is, the initial credit supplied by you which then combined with the debit would immediately zero out the account before any interest accrued.   The transaction is complete, you don't own anything.

The key points to remember are that:

• The bank did not fully disclose the process that occurred.
• The bank did not actually give you anything.
• No-one from the bank actually signed the agreement with you
• The bank no longer has the loan agreement.
John: of the Smith family
c/o 100 Any Road,
ANYTOWN
Anyshire [AA1 1AA]
1^st January 2018

Dear Mr. Thievin Banker,


I am currently performing an audit of my financial obligations as I have found that I may be the victim of fraud and financial malfeasance and while I am sure that a reputable company such as yours would not be a party to such misdeeds, I nonetheless feel that I must be rigorous in my investigation into this matter.

I agree to settle any financial obligation I might lawfully owe, on condition that I receive the following documentation from you:

1. Validation of the debt (the actual accounting);
2. Verification of your claim against me (a sworn affidavit or a hand signed invoice in accordance with The Bills of Exchange Act 1882);
3. A copy of the contract signed by both parties and therefore binding both parties. (I will also require that arrangements be made for me to view the original contract bearing my wet ink signature).

I hereby grant you fourteen (14) days to reply to this notice from the above date with a notice sent using recorded delivery and signed under full commercial liability and penalties of perjury, assuring and promising me that all of the replies and details given to the above requests are true and without deception, fraud or mischief.

Please Note: I wish to deal with this matter in writing and I do not give your organisation permission to contact me by telephone. Should it do so, I must warn you that the calls could constitute ‘harassment’ and I may take action under Section 1 of The Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Signed, and sworn by the name of the Most High, Yah of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob,

 

 

By: John-Michael: Smith; Authorised Representative All Rights Reserved. Without prejudice.

Agreeing to pay, on condition that evidence of a lawful debt can be produced, stops you from being taken to court because courts only adjudicate between parties who are in dispute, and as you have agreed to pay, there is no dispute, so the court would not accept any application for a hearing.    If the bank or credit card company try to do so, You only have to send the court the second copy of your letter agreeing to pay and the case would be thrown out immediately.

The credit card company cannot produce the documents you've asked for, instead, the credit card company will probably send a Statement of what it wants you to believe is the outstanding amount. You should return this with a polite note saying that a Statement is not an Invoice, so would they please provide a signed Invoice as requested.

They will also probably send a photocopy of the Loan Application form, you should write back and point out politely that it does not constitute a contract as it is only signed by one of the parties (you) and you asked for a copy of the Contract signed by both parties, and also remind them that you asked to make arrangements to view the original contract bearing your ‘wet ink’ signature.

The credit card company is likely to go quiet at this point so after the 14 days has expired you should then write again, requesting that the necessary documents be sent to him within the next seven days, and if that does not happen, then you will consider the debt to be fully discharged. (See Conditional Acceptance for details)

More coming soon!

The following notice is a straight forward conditional acceptance requesting proof of a contract between you:

John: of the Smith family
c/o 100 Any Road,
ANYTOWN
Anyshire [AA1 1AA]
1^st June 2019

Notice of Claim Verification

Re: Account No.: 1111-234567-1

Dear Sirs,
I am in receipt of your ACCOUNT STATEMENT and Remittance form dated 10/06/2019.   I must admit to being somewhat confused as I don't have any record of opening an account with you.

This may be because of some error on my part in which case I would be happy to accept and discharge the £199.90 that you claim I owe you.

However, in order to verify this debt, please provide me with a copy of the lawful two party contract, signed both by myself and a representative of Theevin Debt Collectors that forms the basis of the obligation to pay the amount claimed.

Please deliver the requested verification within seven (7) days of your receipt of this letter to the mailing location provided herein. Failure to do so will comprise tacit proof that Theevin Debt Collectors is unable to verify and validate the alleged debt.

Without malice, mischief, ill will, vexation or frivolity, in sincerity and honour,

By: John: Smith (agent)
All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice - Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

More coming soon!

More coming soon!

More coming soon!

More coming soon!

Police Encounters

Why did you pull me over? I'm not discussing my day with you! Am I being detained or am I free to go? Don't say anything at all except "Rice vs Connolly 1966". They have already told you that Anything you say will be USED AGAINST YOU!! Rice vs Connolly 1966 "While there may be a moral duty to answer police questions there is no legal duty to do so"

Court Appearances

Do not sign anything Do not get a lawyer Say the following: For and on the record. I am here in body of flesh and blood I do not consent to these proceedings Your offer is not accepted I do not consent to being a surety for this case and these proceedigs I demand that the bond be immediately brought forward so I can see who will indemnify me if damaged The case should be dismissed

More coming soon!

More coming soon!

More coming soon!

Do you think that we are being governed unjustly?

Ask yourself:

• Did you want to join the European Union?
• Did you want to go to war with Iraq or Afghanistan?
• Did you want to bail out the banks?
• Did you ask to be constantly monitored by CCTV cameras?

This is a simple safeguard put in place to protect our freedoms.    Our ancestors knew there could be a problem one day if the crown became unjust, or turned into some sort of dictatorship, or parliament was acting against the people, or was full of corruption, or was not allowing the crown to keep its oath.

So in article 61 of the Magna Carta it was written that if this ever happened you could petition the crown to sort out the crown's or parliament's problem, the crown had 40 days to fix it or dissolve parliament.
If, after 40 days, nothing was fixed the petitioner could go into rebellion against the crown and parliament under the full protection of our Constitutional Law until the problem was resolved.

By invoking article 61 we are quite clearly stating that we feel we are being governed unjustly and excercising our right go into 'lawful rebellion', and in doing so we would no longer have allegiance to the crown or parliament because they had become corrupt etc, we may peacefully act to hinder in any way possible all actions of the treasonous government of this land, in order to bring to an end the corruption or injustice within the system.    It is law that we can do this, and we are actually obeying the law by doing it, because it is the peoples duty to fight corruption and uphold the law.

Lawful rebellion allows for the following:

• Full refusal to pay any forms of Tax, Fines and any other forms of monies to support or benefit the unlawful government of this country.
• Full refusal to abide by any Legislation or Statute 'Law' invalidly put in place by an unlawful government in breech of the Constitutional safeguard.
• To peacefully hinder in any way possible all actions of the treasonous government of this land, who have breeched the Constitutional safeguard.

Because our constitution cannot be repealed, it is still valid law.

Lawful rebellion is the cornerstone of the Freeman League Society, in order to detach yourself from society, it is vitally important that you have officially revoked the your consent to be governed and have entered into lawful rebellion.

We all know that should a significant portion of us manage successfully to live outside their system that the government will seek to regain contol over us by any means it deems necessary and it will quote law (statute law) to justify itself.

For those who have revoked their consent to be governed according to article 61 of the Magna Carta 1215 there can be no such justification, it would be like a store manager of Tesco's trying to enforce a company rule from the employee's handbook on a passing Traffic Warden, however, if you do happen to work for Tesco's then those rules are law and Tesco's can insist that you follow them or take action against you.
Similarly, if you have not officially entered into lawful rebellion then the government will demand that you conform to its rules and feel justified in taking action against you if you do not follow them.

More coming soon!

More coming soon!

More coming soon!